For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Commercial, IP and Statement of Work Alignment

Overview

Our agile process is designed to operate inside a controlled commercial model. Agile gives flexibility in how we solve problems. It does not remove the need for a clear Statement of Work, commercial authority, acceptance criteria or IP protection.

Statement of Work Alignment

Every phase should be linked to a Statement of Work or other approved commercial authority.

The Statement of Work should define:

  • phase

  • objectives

  • scope

  • out of scope

  • deliverables

  • milestones

  • acceptance criteria

  • assumptions

  • customer responsibilities

  • dependencies

  • team model

  • governance cadence

  • commercial model

  • IP position

  • security and data requirements

Agile Scope Control

The backlog can change frequently. The authorised scope cannot change informally.

A backlog change may remain inside scope where it:

  • supports the agreed objectives

  • does not add material deliverables

  • does not change acceptance criteria materially

  • does not extend timeline or cost

  • does not introduce new material risk

  • does not change the IP or security position

A backlog change should go through change control where it affects:

  • cost

  • timeline

  • deliverables

  • acceptance

  • security

  • data

  • IP

  • supplier obligations

  • material assumptions

Milestone Alignment

Milestones should be connected to evidence.

A milestone should not simply say that a phase has progressed. It should identify what has been delivered, reviewed or accepted.

Examples:

  • discovery findings accepted

  • alpha prototype playback completed

  • beta release deployed to private beta users

  • live readiness evidence approved

  • support model accepted

Acceptance Criteria

Acceptance criteria should be agreed before delivery starts. They may be refined as learning emerges, but material changes must be approved.

Acceptance criteria should be:

  • objective

  • testable

  • linked to deliverables

  • capable of evidence

  • commercially meaningful

  • realistic for the phase

IP Categories

We classify IP as:

  • Background IP: pre-existing company assets, templates, methods, code, frameworks and know-how

  • Foreground IP: IP created specifically during the project

  • Customer IP: materials, data, documents and systems provided by the customer

  • Third-party IP: externally owned components or services

  • Open-source components: components governed by open-source licences

IP Reuse Principles

  • Reuse approved company assets before rebuilding.

  • Do not transfer Background IP unless expressly agreed.

  • Check licence terms before using third-party or open-source components.

  • Do not contaminate reusable assets with customer confidential information.

  • Record improvements that may be reusable.

  • Confirm Foreground IP treatment in the contract or Statement of Work.

Accelerator Use

Accelerators may include:

  • discovery interview guides

  • service blueprint templates

  • backlog templates

  • architecture patterns

  • code scaffolds

  • deployment pipelines

  • test scripts

  • security evidence packs

  • acceptance criteria libraries

  • governance templates

Accelerators should be used when they are relevant, current, secure, legally usable and appropriate to the customer environment.

Commercial Health Checks

At each governance review, ask:

  • Are we still inside the agreed Statement of Work?

  • Are deliverables and acceptance criteria still valid?

  • Are customer dependencies being met?

  • Are changes being controlled?

  • Are milestones and payment triggers supported by evidence?

  • Is the IP position still clear?

  • Are supplier outputs aligned to customer obligations?

Last updated

Was this helpful?